Talk:Doctor Death (magazine)
![]() | Doctor Death (magazine) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 9, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doctor Death novel
[edit]Hi. This is Imtiaz. The Doctor Death I am looking for is a novel. The Dr. Death in this novel is the good guy who goes about helping people fight crime. He is a sort of protector, assasin (all good). I read this novel some 10 years back, quite thick novel. More than 300 pages, approx. I quite enjoyed it but i can't find it anymore...Can anyone help me, please. Contact me on email: yourstruly.mohammed@gmail.com
Thanx in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajmohd (talk • contribs) 15 March 2007, 19:35 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doctor Death (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100428030402/http://www.altuspress.com:80/2008/06/doctor-death-the-complete-doctor-death-in-all-detective/ to http://www.altuspress.com/2008/06/doctor-death-the-complete-doctor-death-in-all-detective/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100428030402/http://www.altuspress.com:80/2008/06/doctor-death-the-complete-doctor-death-in-all-detective/ to http://www.altuspress.com/2008/06/doctor-death-the-complete-doctor-death-in-all-detective/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Suggest split into two articles
[edit]I'd like to split this into two articles: one about the magazine, and one about the unrelated character. Any objections? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- No complaints, so I've just removed all the references to the character as I'm not sure it's notable, unlike the magazine. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Doctor Death (magazine)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SchroCat (talk · contribs) 09:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Mike, I'm happy to pick this one up for you: I've always enjoyed your articles when they hit the front page. I'll review this within a few hours. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! I think this is just a bit too short to take to FAC — I use 1,000 words as my cutoff for FAC, and this clocks in at 918 at the moment. Hard to find much to say about a magazine with only three issues. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | See below. |
Very little to say on this:
That's it from me - a nice article that covers everything I would expect from a short-lived magazine, and done very well too. |
-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC) | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | One minor formatting point: you have "Westport CT" and "Westport, Connecticut": these should be made consistent
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All sources are reliable, no information is unsupported |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | All information supported by citations |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no concerns |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Only one image, correctly licenced |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Very pertinent image, suitably handled |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
All good from me on your changes (or your rationale not to change the colons). I'm happy that this is certainly at GA level. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 08:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 08:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- GA-Class magazine articles
- Low-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles
- GA-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- GA-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class United States comics articles
- United States comics work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles